On November 15, 2013 Sweden lost
to Portugal 2-3 and Portugal sealed their place for the FIFA World Cup 2014
finals to be held in Brazil. All of Portugal’s goals in that well-contested
match were scored by Cristiano Ronaldo. That same day FIFA announced that the
deadline for voting for the Ballon d’Or award for the year had been extended to
November 29. The reason given was this: not many people had voted by then.
Portugal’s victory and FIFA’s decision happening on the same day could be sheer
coincidence, but many read a connection between the two. Some said that the
highly influential UEFA President, Michel Platini, was behind it as he wanted
Ribery of Bayern Munich to win the award this year. But the other day Platini
joked that the reason for the extension was to garner support, not for Ribery,
but for the “Real Madrid forward”. In Spain at least, some sports journalists
thought it wasn’t a joke, it was a statement made in all seriousness. It
appears that Ribery was leading in terms of support for the award till FIFA
made its amazing announcement (hopefully this does not become a precedent), but
conceded that advantage to Ronaldo on that night because his goals were seen as
almost the sole reason for Portugal’s progress in the most famous football
tournament in the world. In any case, when decisions, such as this one of FIFA,
are taken and the reasons given for them are unusual and unconvincing (and somewhat amusing too!),
conspiracy theorists have a field day. And as for conspiracy theories, one can
never be sure which is most likely to be the closest to the truth; at the very
best one can only say which is the most fascinating as a story and is most
capable of generating more and more conspiracy tales.
Cristiano Ronaldo’s reported
reaction to Platini’s observation was sharp: he said he was in a mood to
boycott the ceremony this year. It seems to have been more spontaneous than
carefully thought out because the gains of this statement are unclear. Suppose
he beats Ribery and Messi and gets the award this year, what will he gain by
not receiving the award in the formal ceremony? It would cause embarrassment to
all concerned; any way he would be given the award later. Suppose he doesn’t
get it, what will he gain by not attending the ceremony? Nothing! If he wants
to make a statement, he should make it now - he should say that he would not
accept the award in protest against suggestions that are unfair to him. But this
is unlikely to please many or convince many that his grievance is justified. If
one or two people, even when they happen to be very powerful and influential,
make uncharitable remarks about one, it is not justifiable enough for someone
of his stature to take such a stand. In fact, some would maintain that those
remarks would actually help his case because the anti-establishment votes would
go to him as he would be seen as the victim.
Ronaldo’s reaction had been angrier
and more bitter to FIFA President Sepp Blatter’s observation about him on
October 29 at the Oxford University Union in England. Asked to opine on Ronaldo
and Messi, he had said that the former spent more on hair dressing than the
latter, and as for who is the best, he said he “liked both of them” but he
“preferred Messi”. Set aside the unfortunate hair dressing remark, which
Blatter maintained was made non-seriously, and for which he readily apologized
to the Real Madrid President and to Ronaldo, and which were, incidentally, not
accepted by the player, it was entirely inappropriate for Blatter to publicly
say that he preferred Messi to Ronaldo. The reason is that the voting for the
Ballon D’Or for 2013 was in progress at that time and one might suspect that his
view would probably tilt the scales in favour of Messi, a possibility that
Blatter himself did not rule out, although as mentioned earlier, there is reason to
argue that this remark would more likely benefit Ronaldo for reasons of
victim-hood.
Part of what Ronaldo said by way
of response – “much is explained now” - shows that he believed that Messi
had won at least some of his Ballon d’Or awards because of Blatter’s support
for him. He said he wished Blatter a long life so that “he will continue to
witness...the success of his favourite teams and players.” Considering the
nature of the Electoral College, he was wrong about Messi, but one would
understand that he had reasons to react as cynically as he did, but let us not go
into all that now.
Now, was FIFA’s extension of the voting
period an act of correcting the indiscretion by Blatter? Was the FIFA President
trying to please Real Madrid?
Arsene Wenger has disapproved of the
obsession with Ballon d’Or. In a different way, the brilliant Paris
Saint-Germain and Swedish forward Zlatan Ibrahimovic has said something
similar: “It seems very important for other players, but for me it’s not
important...I don’t need a trophy to tell myself that I’m the best”. But FIFA,
media and the football community have made Ballon d’Or so important.
The latest one hears about Ballon
d’Or 2013 is that it may go to Messi again, notwithstanding the fact that since
April he has been plagued by injury and has been more outside the field than in
it. But if he gets it, one may not be entirely surprised. Till his injury he
was playing superb football and had scored many goals, and had richly
contributed to Barcelona’s winning the League title, and in La Liga this year
he was playing very well too despite not being fully fit, till his injury
forced him to withdraw. True, he did not score in some four matches or so, but in
those matches he played very well and made a difference for his team. However, at
the same time, if he gets the award, then it would underscore perhaps for the first time, the difference between the
professional assessment (that of the Electoral College) and assessment by the
football audience of leading footballers.
In any case, things are really
messy this year. The extension of the voting date is only one of the problems. Now if Messi
gets the award, as is rumoured, then there is a problem, if he doesn’t, then whosoever
gets the award, for many it would be the case of the award going to X when Messi
is out of action on account of injury. Finally, 2014 is the year of the World
Cup. If the Ballon d’Or winner doesn’t perform in the World Cup, then his
Ballon d’Or would not salvage his name.
1 comment:
Someone once said....foul smells are just a state of mind. It is a psychological realization. We might encounter people who see and smells foul in everything and at the same time there are people who are comfortable with any kind of situation. What I feel that at times if we are in such situations we can divert our mind to something else in stead of exaggerating it. I have also encountered people who by the very thought of fish, say for example, reacts obnoxiously.
I once happen to visit Mathura/Vrindavan (India) and there is a place called Nikunjaban --sacred abode of Radha-Krishna. As I was in communique with a sage trying to know about the origin of the place and other stuff, I inquired why this place is littered with excreta of human and animals around and the pungent smell in the air? To this he got infuriated and said in a strong way, 'everything is clean here' and thus refused to talk to me further.
Thank you for highlighting this topic. I am still confused with the Sage's response and the attitude.
Post a Comment