Recently the Hon. Odisha High
Court upheld a lower court decision to the effect that if one does not know how
to read and write in Odia, one cannot be the chairperson of a gram panchayat in
Odisha. The one who had to resign her chairpersonship because of this judgement
is said to have made spelling mistakes in writing and to have failed to read a
passage from a minor class school text book with the expected fluency. She was of
course literate, but there is no incongruity here because the definition of
literacy that we have for the purposes of Census is generous: if one who is
seven and above can read and write with understanding in any language, one is
literate. Although not specifically mentioned, one would assume that “write”
here means “writing without spelling and grammatical errors” and “read”, “read
with the expected fluency”. In terms of this literal definition of literacy,
one is literate if one can read and write his name and the names of his family
members and read some headlines of a newspaper haltingly. One hopes that those
who declare themselves literate to the Census volunteers are capable of a good
deal more! The chairperson under reference is literate and at the same time
didn’t have the language competence in Odia of a minor school student in order to remain
in her position.
One is tempted to guess why India chose to have
such a generous definition of literacy. When India became
independent, the literacy figures of the country were very low - not
unexpectedly though, for literacy for the colonized was not among the
objectives of the colonial administration. A country can hardly be taken
seriously by other countries if a very large number of its people are
illiterate. But people cannot become literate overnight, let alone literate in
a meaningful sense, especially in the case of a newly independent and a big country
like India. At that time making people literate in the literal sense of
the term might have appeared to be a manageable objective. The literacy figures
soon started improving.
Today when India feels mature and confident and
aspires to play a significant role on the world stage, the country needs to
rethink the idea of literacy. It must not feel satisfied with even hundred
percent literacy when this term is defined in its literal sense. The Literacy
programme of the country does have a reasonable notion of literacy in terms of
three R’s, but one does not know the literacy rate of its citizens with respect
to this notion of literacy. This is what the country needs to know. We need to
be informed in every ten years about the percentage of literacy in this sense
as well. Literacy need not be conceptualized so as to be associated with a
certain stage of education: primary, upper primary, middle school, etc. A
definition of literacy that is close to the UNESCO definition should suffice: the
"ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate and
compute, using printed and written materials associated with varying contexts.
Literacy involves a continuum of learning in enabling individuals to achieve
their goals, to develop their knowledge and potential, and to participate fully
in their community and wider society". We must not fail to note in this
definition the point that there cannot be an unchanging notion of “functional”
or what we prefer to call “empowering” literacy. It is not literal, technical
literacy that will really help the citizen; it is empowering literacy that
will.
The implementation of this extremely important
initiative will require strong social and political will. Literacy volunteers
can successfully implement a technical literacy programme, but not a working or
empowering literacy programme. For the latter to happen, every child has to
attend school – school in the right sense of the term, where there are class rooms
with roof and blackboards and there are teachers to teach. And school education
has to go beyond “no failure” model – the unsaid thing is that not just pass-fail
examinations have been dispensed with; along with that teaching has also been largely dispensed with. "Lunch
with an egg” is fine but school has to become again the place where learning
takes place.
No comments:
Post a Comment